Music is ubiquitous. In world cultures, varying instruments, rhythms, melodies, and timbres are everywhere celebrated. But the West evolved differently.
The pervasive attraction of music had long been identified by philosophers. Since the ancient Greek thinker Pythagoras, the earliest Western thinkers identify the sway of music by its affinity with time, sound, and the evocation of emotions. To cultural participants, music is a source of pleasure. Historically, however, this recognition of the power of music has always troubled those who prefered authority.
The philosophers of ancient Greece concur that music has two functions: an educational function in training the child (and the citizen) in spiritual discipline that reflects social conformity. Correctly composed, music served as an adjunct to the process of political integration. Music, furthermore, was a source of military cohesion and allegiance, further promoted by athletics. This theme is especially prominent in Plato.
But between Plato’s Republic and his late and last work Laws, Plato changed. In the Republic the educational function dominates, but in the Laws, Plato has given up on the educational and uplifting role of music to define music as subversive and dangerous. The uplifting element, he avers, is pleasure. “This is intolerable and blasphemous.“ (Jowett translation). Rather than use music to educate and uplift all citizens, as he once advocated,Plato drops the universality of education and restricts the function (and pleasure) of music to the highest class.
In the Laws, Plato states that “A lawgiver may institute melodies which have a natural truth and correctness without any fear of failure. To do this, however, must be the work of God, or of a divine person…. The fairest music is that which delights the best and best educated, and especially that which delights the one man who is pre-eminent in virtue and education.“
Plato had already hinted at this conclusion in the Republic, where music (rightly used) was reserved to warriors and philosopher-kings. Warrior education had the benefit of music supportive of athletics, while literature,essentially tales of warfare, had the benefitof inculcating martial sentiments. But music must be even more tightly controlled, and Laws goes further: “We must take it that the finest music is that which delights the best man, the properly educated, that above all, which pleases the one man who is supreme in goodness and education.”
Plato’s philosophical successor Aristotle essentially concurs. In his Politics, Aristotle concludes about music that: “Since music is a pleasure, and excellence consists in rejoicing and loving and hating rightly, there is clearly nothing which we are so much concerned to acquire and to cultivate as the power of forming right judgments, and of taking delight in good dispositions and noble actions.” Given the anciet Greek context, right judgment consists in the dispositions and actions ofthe ruling class and authorities.
The interpretation of music in the Western world after the ancient Greeks essentially remained the same. Music being originally defined as pleasure meant that the effect of music must continue to be circumscribed. With Christianity, this project could be accomplished because music could be made to serve belief, spirituality, theology, and liturgy. Thus, St. Augustine’s essay “De Musica” (“On Music”) safely assumes the absorption of music into church polity and only writes of music in Pythagorean terms of mathematics.
And while music, like thought in general, embracing more secular modes in early modern times, the notion of subordination to the the interests of the dominate class came to characterize Western music into the modern era. This is the context of baroque and early classical music that is seldom addressed versus the ostensible “pleasure orinciple” which the Greeks early defined. The structure of music presentation and performance was bound by patronage. Most music was performed to entertain patrons: barons, duchesses, princes, and queens, to provide background music (that is, pleasuere) to their breakfast, afternoon, dinner, party, or rest time. J. S. Bach attempted to reconcile these duties with religious-oriented music and to device compositions based on Pythagorean mathematics, but his less talented fellow-composers were more dutiful. Not until Vival (employed as a music teacher) and Beethoven (motivated by a sense of accomplishment to supercede the childhood trauma of his musician-father’s beatings) does music slough off is pragmatic function of entertaining the powerful.
With pop music, commercialism is the underlying motive, and rhythm is the dominant structure, with the lyrics of Eros dominating aethetics. Isn’t every set of lyrics either “woo-woo-woo” or “boo-hoo-hoo”? Pop music is reduced to the soundtrack of driving or exercising.
How to address the trouble with music? At a minimum avoiding the martial tones of many concertos and symphonies, the contrivances of rapid, frenetic, or repetitive phrases. Perhaps investigating the lives of composers in order to deduce their compositional motives and identify with their aesthetic interests. Or shifting to music not beautiful as manipulation but because it eschews emotion in favor of naturalness, impressions of nature rather than assumptions about pleasure. Or, perhaps, pursuit of Zen music and instrumentation. Or ambient music. Or, finally, silence.